![]() In reality, however, there is little to no evidence to support the view that alchemy led to Newton’s belief in action at a distance. Contemporary sources ranging from popular outlets such as Wikipedia to serious scholarly monographs echo this theme. Couldn’t this sort of explanation have stimulated Newton to think of gravity in terms of an immaterial attraction? And wasn’t alchemy based on the idea that some materials react with others because of a similar principle of affinity? Thus the idea that Newton’s involvement with alchemy was part of a quest to understand gravitational attraction was born. The reason why a lodestone attracted iron at a distance was because of a hidden sympathy between the two, like the occult sympathies governing magical phenomena. The major scholars of the subject at that time, especially Westfall, argued that the impact of alchemy on Newton’s more mainstream science lay in his emphasis on invisible forces that could act over a considerable space, such as gravitational attraction. There is currently a widespread ‘master narrative’ of Newton’s alchemy, though one with which I disagree. Can his alchemical work be seen as foundational for modern science or was it a dead end? His work on alchemy is your area of expertise and the subject of your latest book: Newton the Alchemist. You mentioned Newton’s alchemical papers. So there’s a lot of material that Westfall wasn’t able to take account of, yet all the same, his work is a magnificent synthesis. Westfall didn’t have access to all of that in 1980. Part of the reason for that is because we now have digital sites like the Newton Project in the UK, which has been editing Newton’s theological and religious writings-his prophetic writings more generally-and then the Chymistry of Isaac Newton site that I am the general editor of at Indiana University, that’s been editing the alchemical papers, Newton’s work on chemistry. Some of the other books that I recommended represent attempts to come to terms with sections of Newton’s work in a deeper way than Westfall was able to do in 1980. ![]() It’s somewhat dated now, because it appeared in 1980 and Newton scholarship has recently experienced a remarkable change. It’s the only treatment of Newton that really tries to give a detailed study of the totality of his science alongside his religion and his work on alchemy, which covered more than 30 years. The first of the books about Isaac Newton you’ve chosen is a biography, Never at Rest by Richard Westfall. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton Foreign Policy & International Relations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |